Feminist icon Gloria Steinem wrote a piece for the New York Times today about female politicians and the gender gap in voting. It’s a smart, succinct censure of the media for what she sees as a common failure, when talking about women in politics, to separate the serious thinkers and policy-makers from the “sideshows.” She argues that women vote for women, and men, who represent their issues, which explains why leaders like Nancy Pelosi and Olympia Snowe benefit from the gender gap, while their Mama Grizzly counterparts like Michelle Bachman and Sharron Angle don’t.
Until the media understand that the majority of a constituency picks its own leaders, we’re all in danger of missing the main event.
You know what else makes us in danger of missing the main event, and helps explain a bit about why, as Steinem points out, the world didn’t know more about Gabrielle Giffords before she was almost assassinated in Tuscon last month?
Because pieces like this still end up in the Women’s Fashion section of the New York Times Style Magazine.
I get that Steinem’s writing is accompanied by some lovely black and white photographs of the brilliant (and, yes, quite stylish) women mentioned in the piece. Still, I spent the whole time reading it actually hoping that she would mention their clothes, because at least then there would have been some tiny relevance to the fashion issue.
See, this ridiculousness actually made me hope that I was reading yet another article about smart, powerful women’s clothing choices.